Apple’s Win Would be Terrorists’ Gain

By Karen

Apple’s refusal to help the FBI access San Bernadino mass-murderer Syed Farook’s iPhone is a joke. The world leader in creating innovative devices and software devised this super-tricky password feature that wipes an iPhone clean after 10 failed attempts to get in, and they want us to believe they don’t have the code to bypass it.

Well, I think they do — they just don’t want their customers to know it.

It’s like KFC claiming Colonel Sanders deleted ingredients from his secret formula for delicious fried chicken when he retired from the company, and they’re OK with that.

Apple CEO Tim Cook wrote an open letter to customers to justify Apple’s disingenuous stance. The implication is that Apple employs no one trustworthy enough not to steal the code and use it with evil intent, or sell it to the highest-bidding hacker. It’s just human nature.

It also implies that Apple itself can’t be trusted. Cook writes: “And while the government may argue that its (the code’s) use would be limited to this case, there is no way to guarantee such control.”

Apple’s been given permission to write their code in a closet, slip the results to the FBI through a crack under the door, and then immediately destroy the code.

But Apple thinks it will somehow become a “master key” out in the public domain that anyone may use to hack into any iPhone at any time.

Who could possibly be responsible for that happening except Apple?

It’s the old slippery slope tactic. You know, “If we let gays marry, people will be marrying their dogs next.”

Cook also claims: “The government could extend this breach of privacy and demand that Apple build surveillance software to intercept your messages, access your health records or financial data, track your location, or even access your phone’s microphone or camera without your knowledge.”

Does he really think none of this happens now? My iPad Mini tries to track my location every day.

There’s a supreme irony in Apple fighting to maintain the purity of the very devices its customers use to splash the illustrated minutiae of their lives all over the Internet.

And the government already has access to whatever crumbs are left. Let’s not kid ourselves. The TSA can even fondle your boobs and stick its hands down your pants.

If Tim Cook is allowed to obstruct justice and spit in the faces of the San Bernadino victims’ families, he’ll certainly gain a lock on the terrorist smartphone market. ISIS can rely on Apple’s protection, no matter how many slaughters are coordinated on iPhones.

But if one more dead terrorist turns up with another inviolable iPhone after another domestic massacre, I don’t think it would be remiss for the feds to charge Mr. Cook with aiding terrorists and being an accessory to murder before and after the fact.


4 Responses to Apple’s Win Would be Terrorists’ Gain

  1. Koda says:

    Karen – I could not agree with you more. That this has become “controversial” is all Apple’s fault. I’ve read a lot of internet comments on this and it amazes me how many people believe that there should be information that is not available to law enforcement with a valid warrant. This just encourages all manner of criminals to keep their info on a I Phone. The law of search and seizure has very few exceptions (doctor/patient, confessional). If the law allows (and it does) a body cavity search, then the phone is a no brainer (for most of us, anyway).

  2. Francis Alan Wormald says:

    AN intelligent , correct assessment I could not have made..LISTEN TIMMY BOY!!!

  3. catsworking says:

    Thank you, Koda. I have no fond feelings for Bill Gates, but in researching this post, I saw that he also thinks Apple should cough up the code and help the FBI.

    It’s a given there’s valuable intel on the iPhone in question, simply by the behavior of the terrorist couple. They knew what they were doing with technology. They smashed their other devices to a pulp so nothing was recoverable. Syed stopped backing up this iPhone to the iCloud on Oct. 19 so the feds have nothing on any of his communications in the weeks leading up to the shootings.

    Funny thing is that the model of phone he had (5c) is exactly the one I was considering before I decided it was too pricey for an old model and went with an Android. Who knew I might have used the 5c to pull off myriad nefarious deeds with Apple’s blessing?

    In the case of terrorist activity, I think all bets should be off when it comes to protecting known perps.

  4. Cynthia Del Buono says:

    So Apple does understand being betrayed? They are betraying the families of good Americans. If allowing Apple to control the situation is what they want, who don’t they trust, themselves?

    If it was my family, I’d want all the information I could find. WWTD? What would Trump do?😂

    Sent from my iPad


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: