By Karen
I was sort of railroaded into seeing New Moon last week (don’t ask). I know I’m spitting in the face of the film’s rampaging success, but as a vampire aficionado, I hated almost every minute of it.
At least Mathew DeKinder of the St. Louis Suburban Journals is in my corner.
First, I don’t understand why author Stephanie Meyer gave nocturnal titles to any of her 4 Twilight saga books. She could have called the series High Noon. By ignoring or failing to research vampire legend, her vampires are basically ordinary folk with pale skin and red eyes — more albino than bloodsucker. They don’t drink human blood. In daylight, they sparkle like jewels. Sunlight doesn’t even sting.
Nighttime, coffins, native earth, crosses, mirrors, stakes, running water. Forget ‘em. These pathetic excuses for vamps probably order extra garlic on their Domino’s pizza.
I know, I know. I need to read the books to see why vampire Edward Cullen is so mesmerizing. But I never read the books because I suspected no good could come from a Mormon writer playing with the undead, and New Moon proves me right. She’s steered a whole generation wrong on vampires.
The audience consisted mostly of teen girls. God help them if they identify with boring Bella Swan. Bella loves the vacant Edward, while a werewolf named Jacob loves her, and we waste the better part of 2 hours watching the 3 of them stare deeply into each other’s shallow eyes.
In Twilight world, the ultimate sin a vampire can commit is to go shirtless and let people see him sparkle.
Werewolves don’t fare much better. A full moon doesn’t trigger their transformation. Just annoy them and they turn furry. As humans, they wear nothing but shorts year-round in the Northwest. Shorts that seem to miraculously disappear and reappear. I wondered if they represented the ubiquitous underwear Mitt Romney refuses to talk about.
The film never explains why Bella loves Edward, but much of her screen time is spent is moping around after he disappears “forever” to protect her — from what? Another vampire sparkling at her?
Except for a few moments of spectacular werewolf special effects, New Moon is sheer tedium, the brief appearance of Michael Sheen (Tony Blair in The Queen, David Frost in Frost/Nixon) as ancient vampire Aro notwithstanding. Why, Michael, why?
Dracula, Nosferatu, Lestat, and Eric from True Blood must be curling in their coffins to think the torch has been passed to a droopy drip like Edward Cullen.
I’m counting on Johnny Depp to restore vampires to their former gory glory in 2010 when he plays Barnabas Collins in the remake of Dark Shadows.
November 25, 2009 at 6:54 pm
Ya know I got roped into reading those books by my cousin. Not a bad read if your 16 with relationship issues and no date for the prom.
But I have to go with you its really not Vampires in the traditional sense at all.
Give me Lestat any day as troubled and beautiful as he was Pre-Cruise, or Jack Crow the abusive Vampire Hunter from John Steakley’s novel Vampire$. Played to great effect by James Woods.
Hell give me Gary Oldman playing Dracula, but please leave out Keanu Reeves..
I am 100% behind you on this one Karen, teen lovestory YES, Money Maker YES, Vampire Movie ..Hell No..
November 26, 2009 at 10:39 am
Bob, later I realized there was one thing I forgot to mention. Fangs. Not a single fang in the whole movie, except on the werewolves.
Pity the poor teen who runs into a vampire and expects him to SPARKLE.
Film history is filled with great vampires who could all wipe the floor with poor wimpy Edward Cullen. I’m kind of surprised I haven’t gotten a bunch of hate comments from teenage girls setting me straight.
When I was a teenager, my vampire idol was Barnabas. OK, it was a May-December type of crush, but when push came to shove, he was a vampire’s vampire. And I had no date to the prom, by the way. Falling for a vampire certainly isn’t the route to popularity.
My friend Shelley, who has read the Twilight books, told me that Edward never gave Bella a reason to fall for him, even in the first book, and that there’s a certain contingent who thinks Bella should end up with the werewolf.
November 26, 2009 at 3:02 pm
Karen, just on a side note, Nosferatu is not actually a characters name. The 1922 movie was named thusly but the vampire in the film was named Count Orlok.
Either/Or he or any “Real” Vampire, George Hamilton incuded, would kick Edwards sparkly panzy ass..
Happy Thanksgiving Everyone
Gobble Gobble
Bob
November 27, 2009 at 10:33 am
Don’t forget the young Frank Langella, sigh.
November 27, 2009 at 10:41 am
Bob, of course you are right. I stand corrected on Nosferatu. It’s more of a generic term for vampires, and no one seems to know its origins and it can have many meanings.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nosferatu_(word)
But I guess it sounded scarier to call the movie Nosferatu than Count Orlok.
November 27, 2009 at 10:48 am
Cindy, yes, Frank Langella made a great vampire. I also liked Louis Jourdan as Dracula in a made-for-TV movie. Very suave.
November 29, 2009 at 10:04 am
I have read the books, but the films take the saga to a whole new level. Beautiful young stars, great cinematics and a sound track that rocks… Can@t wait for number 3. Oh well, i’ll just have to reread the books…
November 29, 2009 at 11:47 am
Let’s not forget Brad Pitt as Louis…double sigh…..
Zappa’s mom
November 29, 2009 at 12:12 pm
Jacob, welcome! Obviously, the Twilight saga is an acquired taste. I agree with you that Bella and Jacob are attractive actors (particularly Jacob), but Edward strikes me as a wimp no matter how you slice it. The werewolf special effects were hands down the best part of the movie.
November 29, 2009 at 12:14 pm
Zappa’s Mom, when I read Interview with the Vampire back in the ’70s, Louis was my favorite as well. I thought Anne Rice added immensely to vampire lore with that book. Lestat started out well, but the books seemed to degenerate over time until I could barely get through them. I think Queen of the Damned was the last one I enjoyed, but I remember it as a tough slog.
December 16, 2009 at 9:17 pm
I’m just throwing this out there… Hayden Pantierre would’ve made a great Bella Swan. http://bit.ly/4G5pT1
December 17, 2009 at 9:48 am
Simcox, I’ve never heard of Hayden Pantierre, so I have no opinion on her suitability as Bella, but it’s a part I wouldn’t wish on any young actress. What a doormat!
December 17, 2009 at 10:34 pm
Do you tweet and have a twitter account so I can follow you?
December 18, 2009 at 9:58 am
Sorry Lydic, Cats Working never tweets.
December 19, 2009 at 4:19 pm
Amen! I hated the movie but since it’s such a fuss I thought I read the book, and I gave up after about 3 chapters, which is rare for me, because I always try to finish a book (or a movie). Mayer is just unbareable. Anne Rice should kick her ass.
December 19, 2009 at 5:03 pm
Welcome, piromanka! I have a friend who said she had a hard time getting into the first book and it took several tries. And she said the following books became more and more verbose, as if editors were afraid to touch Meyer’s prose. It’s a shame if she’s a lousy writer, because now she’ll never learn and she’ll just keep churning our mediocre books. As long as there are teenagers who can’t tell good writing from bad, she’ll be a cash cow.
February 6, 2010 at 5:05 pm
Twilight meets Buffy the Vampire Slayer.
I laughed my fangs off for this one.
http://blip.tv/file/2261825/
Or,how bout Edward meets Blade the Vampire Hunter??
I don’t think Eddie is going to cutesy his way out of this one!!
http://team-twilight.com/20090831/blade-meets-edward-cullen/
February 7, 2010 at 3:04 pm
Bob, that was hilarious! I never watched Buffy, but it was fun to see her kick the crap out of Cullen. That was very well-done!